Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Magnemite evolutionary line
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep. Confirmed as a merge in progress, therefore no need to keep discussion going. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 22:40, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Magnemite evolutionary line (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
It appears that there are already separate articles for each of the characters. The article is redundant. Pleasehelp 21:18, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy close. Not at all a reason for deletion. What you want is {{split}}. Ten Pound Hammer • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 21:05, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]- Okay, now your rationale is a little bit more sensible. Personally, I'm not sure what should be done here -- either keep the individual articles and nuke this one, or merge the individual articles into this one. Ten Pound Hammer • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 21:22, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- It's a merge-in-progress, which is why the individual articles also exist. – mcy1008 (talk) 21:28, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Like he said. This is a merge-in-progress. By the end of it, the rationale for deletion won't be valid, since Magnemite, Magneton, and Magnezone will redirect into Magnemite evolutionary line. — Preceding unsigned comment added by You Can't See Me! (talk • contribs)
- Then if it is, I shall close this discussion. Ten Pound Hammer • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 22:36, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Like he said. This is a merge-in-progress. By the end of it, the rationale for deletion won't be valid, since Magnemite, Magneton, and Magnezone will redirect into Magnemite evolutionary line. — Preceding unsigned comment added by You Can't See Me! (talk • contribs)
- For future reference, please refer to the following discussions (and one proposal):
- Wikipedia_talk:Pokémon Collaborative Project/Archive 14#Is there any reason why all Pokemon are necessarily notable?
- Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Pokémon/Archive 15#A combination proposal
- (note: The above two pages are archives. If you want to continue the discussion, do so on the current page.)
- It's a merge-in-progress, which is why the individual articles also exist. – mcy1008 (talk) 21:28, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You Can't See Me! 22:34, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.