The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was SPEEDY DELETE per nearly unanimous discussion, and User:Kyaa the Catlord. JIP | Talk 10:34, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

MSF-007 Gundam Mk-III (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

During a mass de-prodding of articles by TheFarix on Gundam related articles, I reviewed the various removals of the subst'd {{prod}} and have listed this one, the MSF Gundam Mk-III for deletion, as it does not assert its own importance in the Gundam metaseries.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 01:22, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy Delete Content? What content? Kyaa the Catlord 01:28, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete per nom. Also, that entire Gundam template needs to be cleaned up since it's huge and I doubt every single mech on the show deserves an article (I am not familiar enough with the franchise to know which ones are or are not notable). TJ Spyke 01:44, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete Oh come on. This is an encyclopedia, not an... I don't know what... this doesn't belong here whatever the case. Jobjörn (Talk ° contribs) 01:47, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment This is more what I like to see instead of the WP:POINTed {{Prod}}ding of articles in-mass without taking time to determine if it should be cleaned up, merger or deleted. --Farix (Talk) 02:18, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: Well, {{Prod}} is for uncontroversial deletions which do not meet criteria for speedy deletion. If someone thinks it shouldn't be deleted, but rather cleaned up or merged, just remove the prod tag. It seems now as if you do not actually have anything to object... so why the prod tag removal? How could deletion of an article on a fictional weapon (mobile suit) from the Mecha design series Ζ-MSV be controversial whatever the case? Jobjörn (Talk ° contribs) 02:23, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment The person who originally prodded the article was doing so as part of a WP:POINT campaign about a group of articles that are in serious need of cleanup and mergers. Such campaigns should be automatically be contested, even if some of the articles that were prodded should be deleted. --Farix (Talk) 02:35, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete per nom. Bigtop 02:21, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletions. -- SkierRMH 03:24, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Another article without real content but spec, so no objection here. L-Zwei 05:51, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete No sources to show notability. Have there been articles written with this as the primary subject in verifiable and reliable independent sources? Edison 05:59, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Does not appear notable within the Gundam series. Even the de-prodder doesn't appear per his comments above to want this kept. WJBscribe ^{(WJB talk)} 06:03, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per my nom in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AMX-104 R-Jarja. MER-C 06:52, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete per nom and ALL related articles. This reminds me of when Curt Cobain died and somebody told and I said "Who?" MiracleMat 07:24, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete - does not assert notability, and per my PROD nomination. Moreschi ^Deletion! 09:39, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.