The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:01, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

MC Honky (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence this meets WP:GNG. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:05, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:02, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:03, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker^talk 01:33, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. There's plenty of evidence if one is willing to search for it, in addition to the 2 sources already cited in the article. Plenty from a Google search including The Guardian ([1]), Metro Times ([2]), NPR ([3]), The Encyclopedia of Popular Music ([4]), The Michigan Daily ([5]), and Uncut ([6]), and 15 articles on HighBeam for a start. --Michig (talk) 07:16, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per sources found by Michig which establishes notability. –Davey2010 • (talk) 22:48, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Per above keeps. Epeefleche (talk) 00:11, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.