The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Saga of the Skolian Empire. (non-admin closure) —Theopolisme 14:54, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lyshriol (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This topic fails WP:N. Google News archive isn't yielding coverage in reliable sources, and Google Books primarily provides links to books written by the author who uses this name in their books. I found this one passing mention ([1]), but not finding significant coverage in multiple reliable sources. Also the article is written in an in-universe style that lacks real-world context and sourced analysis. Northamerica1000^(talk) 07:09, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 07:31, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 07:31, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge/Redirect to Saga of the Skolian Empire because there are no independent reliable sources to justify a standalone article. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 08:59, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge. I'd be happy to do the merge, as I have redacted many of the Skolian Saga articles. Drop me a note when the discussion is closed. Debresser (talk) 09:37, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:16, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete having looked for sources, and finding none that could WP:verify notability. Notability needs more than a WP:TRIVIALMENTION to be established. Would also support a merge as a compromise, but definitely not enough significant coverage to write a good article (in terms of policy). Shooterwalker (talk) 20:51, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.