The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was nomination withdrawn. Canley (talk) 00:10, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of people named Gurung (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Notability of the most of the people in this list is questionable. No reference at all. Why these people are notable to be the part of encyclopedia is unknown? Having "Gurung" surname doesn't make anyone Encyclopedic. Verification is necessary. I support deletion or trimming the article till verified entries. Hitro 17:14, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. —Cliff smith ^talk 17:19, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. This doesn't need references, its just a list. I would suggest keeping the list even if all the redlinks are removed. Gurung is large enough, and this is great idea for a split. It will eventuall fill in with bluelinks. In addition, there probably aren't tons of English writing Nepalese people that can track down English language reliable sources for articles on notable Nepalese people. Therefore, per WP:BIAS, I would suggest holding onto most of the redlink until someone with familiarity with the situation takes a look. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 20:05, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - a disambig from Gurung is really all this is. I will however be removing all redlinked articles from the list --T-rex 21:09, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment- I agree with T-Rex. Removal of red link articles makes it alright. AfD should be closed on this consensus.Hitro 21:22, 24 August 2008 (UTC)Hitrohit2001[reply]
• Gurung disambig page is all we need. Keep and close the AfD. -- iMatthew _T.C. 22:23, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.