The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jayjg ^(talk) 02:20, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

List of Irish Baptist College people (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A "list" implies that there are plural entries, whereas, once all non-notable names have been removed, only one entry remains in this "list". Ἀλήθεια 14:30, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. This doesn't meet any of the Speedy criteria, else I'd do it myself - but we have no need for this article. The one individual listed, Hamilton Moore, is discussed at the Irish Baptist College article itself. The only two non-AFD-related links to this article were Irish Baptist College (which I removed) and Hamilton Moore, which I also removed (since the college was already linked). Add to that the fact that the title is not a good search term, and delete becomes the better option (over a redirect, though I would not object to a redirect). UltraExactZZ ^Said ~ Did 16:37, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete for the reasons given by UltraExactZZ and Ἀλήθεια|. This is not a close call. Novaseminary (talk) 19:02, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. I'm not sure the lone entry, Moore, even passes WP:PROF. Niteshift36 (talk) 19:18, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - I gave Moore a weak pass on the following basis: "Criterion 6 may be satisfied, for example, if the person has held the post of President or Chancellor (or Vice-Chancellor in countries where this is the top academic post) of a significant accredited college or university..." I agree that his notability is suspect at best. Ἀλήθεια 19:32, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • Unless one of those titles in the article mean Chancellor etc, then I still don't see it. Niteshift36 (talk) 04:34, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.