The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 04:30, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lisa Mahood (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previously deleted by soft delete but now restored. I believe she still fails WP:NPOL and WP:BIO. LibStar (talk) 23:39, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians, Women, and Australia. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 07:28, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - not seeing significant coverage in reliable sources Mujinga (talk) 08:34, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Fails WP:NPOLITICIAN. WWGB (talk) 09:00, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Local government members aren't inherently notable nor are failed state candidates. Also doesn't seem to meet WP:GNG. // GMH Melbourne TALK 12:55, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Fails WP:NPOLITICIAN; fails WP:GNG. Spinifex&Sand (talk) 03:44, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment I restored per request as it was essentially a PROD. I did not look into merit and am neutral here as it's not a subject I'm interested in digging into. Star Mississippi 01:39, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Clearly fails to comply with WP:NPOL and WP:GNG. --NiftyyyNofteeeee (talk) 13:29, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.