The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 23:09, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lamech Records (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable record label. —teb728 t c 06:11, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. sst✈ 06:45, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. sst✈ 06:45, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:01, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - No claim to notabilty and basically no coverage anywhere. --allthefoxes ^(Talk) 01:30, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Unlikely better notable for the guidelines unless convincing Swedish coverage is found. SwisterTwister talk 06:45, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.