The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:53, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kumari Sweta (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't seem to fulfil WP:SINGER. Majority of the "sources" links to YouTube or the subject's own page on respective streaming platforms. Infobox states she won a Best Singer award but isn't sourced. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 08:15, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Women, and India. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 08:15, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bihar-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:16, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete multiple reliable sources are not found. Delete per nom's arguments. Assirian cat (talk) 09:46, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as being a violation of WP:PROMO (i'd even wonder if WP:CSD#G11 could apply here). The article author may well be the subject themselves, such is the extent of the promotional inclusion of external links and uploading an image of what is purported to be the subject of the article as their own work. The inclusion of "best singer" (largely meaningless without context) in the infobox may be an underhand attempt to avoid WP:CSD#A7, but I agree with nom that this person doesn't seem to pass WP:SINGER. Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 10:28, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete no sources found. Appears PROMO as above. Oaktree b (talk) 17:04, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - there is nothing in the article's sourcing that establishes notability nor could I find any. The article is promotional complete with a huge link farm. Whpq (talk) 03:46, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.