The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can . Daniel (talk) 08:36, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kot Guraya (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am unable to verify this. As best as I can determine, the original source is GEONames or some predecessor to it, as I find a 1962 listing which matches these coordinates. Given that there are no seconds given, this is way too imprecise to identify with a map or aerial feature. Other hits seem to be false or clickbait. I'm inexperienced in dealing with Pakistani locations, so I'm not sure what official resources can be brought to bear, but if someone can point them out, or better still update the article, I'd be happy to withdraw this, but the imprecision of the coordinates is already a bad sign. Mangoe (talk) 03:27, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:40, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:40, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.