The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge. Yamamoto Ichiro 会話 06:00, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kokoro no Tamago (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Article is too short and too vague, not enough information. Momusufan (talk) 23:46, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep valid stub. --Blanchardb-^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}-timed 00:18, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep As Blanchardb said, it's a valid stub. Fg2 (talk) 01:46, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Broadening to Keep or merge after further consideration. Fg2 (talk) 05:10, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. —Fg2 (talk) 02:14, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Given that it was never released as a single, per WP:MUSIC it should be merged into Buono!, unless there's an article for the album into Honto no Jibun, the article for the single I hadn't noticed this is the b side from. —Quasirandom (talk) 02:18, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note This song is the B track to the single Honto no Jibun. Momusufan (talk) 02:24, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge and redirect, as Quasirandom has ably proposed. -- Hoary (talk) 02:48, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge and redirect to the single it's a b-side of. B-sides are rarely notable in and of themselves.--h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 13:42, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong Keep Woww!... Okay! THE Hello! Project's BUONO!!! Of course I agree to strong keep this KOKORO♥ちゃん. I think so valid stub. done. OAS ^{talk to me} 17:32, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Sigh. Ok, let's go through the motions here: WP:ILIKEIT and all that... TomorrowTime (talk) 20:41, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge It's a B-side of a single. Unless something earth-shattering happens, it'll never be more than a stub saying as much as I've said in the first sentence of this argument. If something earth-shattering should indeed happen, the article can be re-created then. TomorrowTime (talk) 20:41, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.