The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Missvain (talk) 07:40, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kids World (film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NFILM pretty readily, not much coverage beyond a review in Variety and that's the only RS I found regarding it. tutterMouse (talk) 20:48, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. tutterMouse (talk) 20:51, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

UK DVD: (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

• Keep It's a Christopher Lloyd film after all and New Zealand project too. Beyond Variety (impressive that they took notice), I found another at Urban Cinefile, and the thing brought award attention to its stars. Yes, it definitely needs use of sources, but it's just notable enough to allow a keep and improve over time and through diligent efforts. No need to delete. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.}
• Keep. A Variety review, even a flawed one, is almost always a demonstration of notability for a film. Other sources listed above by M.Q. Schmidt are fine as well. Cavarrone 07:36, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:57, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:57, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.