The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirected to List of Baahubali characters. UltraExactZZ ^Said ~ Did 13:30, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kattappa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The character has little or no notability outside the film. None of the sources used in the article substantively talk about the character to establish its notability or to warrant a standalone article. This one clearly fails WP:GNG and WP:FICT. —Vensatry _(talk) 06:43, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to List of Baahubali characters, once the list is created. If not, then Baahubali (franchise). --Kailash29792 (talk) 06:51, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:06, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Unnotable film character and article in long term. -Varmapak ^(talk) 06:23, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Completely unnotable film character. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 14:37, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:53, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:53, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to List of Baahubali characters as that appears to be an appropriate target/place for this character. Aoba47 (talk) 14:39, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - no notability outside of the film. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:14, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to List of Baahubali characters. Though presently the character doesn't appear notable enough for a standalone article but the kind of buzz it has created for the film viewers a redirect would be appropriate. Just check the number of views this page receives. --Skr15081997 (talk) 16:47, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.