The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep per WP:SK#4. ✗plicit 11:28, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kanishka Pandey (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject not notable and fails to meet WP:NSPORT Advait (talk) 04:32, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Advait (talk) 04:32, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Advait (talk) 04:32, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:26, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment. Surely NSPORT is the wrong guideline, the relevant guideline would be WP:NAUTHOR or WP:NACADEMIC. Geschichte (talk) 07:41, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:44, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment OP is now CU blocked. Meters (talk) 20:52, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.