The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jayjg ^(talk) 01:08, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kamen Rider Femme (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-major character. No sources within article that indicate real-world notabiblity. NotARealWord (talk) 18:36, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:25, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• delete (or merge, but there being no sourced, third party content, there is nothing to merge) fails WP:N no non-trivial third party content. Active Banana ( ^bananaphone 21:30, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• We really need an Episode Final article. If we had, a merge into that would be a no-brainer. jgpTC 22:02, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge into Kamen Rider Ryuki: Episode Final, now that I've created the page. History will need to be kept for copyright reasons as I've pasted large chunks of this article into there. jgpTC 11:54, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - If merge really is necessary, I hope the admin who closes this notices that. NotARealWord (talk) 16:40, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, the article is not notable as the character is only in a movie and the article has no reliable secondary sources. Powergate92Talk 22:24, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge to Kamen Rider Ryuki: Episode Final.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 17:57, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Fails WP:NOTE, lack of significant coverage in reliable secondary sources. Page seems to be mostly just a collection of original research violation, no real significant secondary source discussion or critical commentary of any kind whatsoever. -- Cirt (talk) 20:50, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - What can we (or anybody else) do about that copyright/page history thing (mentioned above)? NotARealWord (talk) 21:47, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.