Langbahn Team – Weltmeisterschaft

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kamal Mustafa (filmmaker)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. per WP:SNOW Yunshui 雲水 11:21, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kamal Mustafa (filmmaker)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

Kamal Mustafa (filmmaker) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Weak delete, fails WP:NCREATIVE. Störm (talk) 08:20, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:28, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:28, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 09:47, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 09:47, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
See also this AFD. Praxidicae (talk) 16:56, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
And this and this. Praxidicae (talk) 17:11, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@User: Praxidicae Thanks for mentioning the link i have seen all the previous deleted article but they were not notable you are right but on this article i have seen enough references in Google and Newspapers such as Gulf news , The News , The News (Newspaper) , Nai Baat , Humsub and urdupoint. You can't deny all references just because this article was created in past. You need to say about the reference.

Memon KutianaWala (talk) 17:19, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I think you fundamentally misunderstand how AFD and notability work. There is virtually no difference with regard to actual independent reliable sources in the 12+ times this has been deleted and in fact, the only change in sourcing is what I would consider deceitful - it's almost exclusively content submitted or written by the subject. See below. Praxidicae (talk) 18:08, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Source assessment table
Source Independent? Reliable? Significant coverage? Count source toward GNG?
~ Yes No A two sentence mention of the subject ✘ No
No written by the subject No no editorial oversight on user submissions No see above ✘ No
No I have sincere doubts that this is actually independent as it appears to be a piece submitted to a writer there & its partially an interview I have doubts about the editorial integrity of this particular piece ✘ No
No very similar to #2 No no indication of who the author is No ✘ No
Almost certainly not independent as the News Desk submissions are user submissions generally No see above, no indication that they have any editorial oversight No see above ✘ No
No Like the other sources above, I have doubts about this being independent. These are from questionable sources to begin with and are worded nearly the same with the same titles just one word different which leads me to believe this is likely PR submitted. see above No see above ✘ No
We have no idea who wrote this. The website is operated by a journalist however it's the equivalent of a blog and does not indicate she is even the writer. No per above No ✘ No
No see below No This particular site is misleading but it is all user generated like a wiki. It's not reliable and it's not coverage. No ✘ No
No Interview, definitely isn't independent Doubtful and worth noting that it has almost been exclusively used by sockmasters related to this subject. No ✘ No
No interviews of this nature are not independent sincerely doubt this is a reliable source No ✘ No
I have sincere doubts that this would fall under independent, reliable or significant but that's based on a translation and this looks like a blog. see above No This doesn't appear to be about the subject, but just a passing mention ✘ No
No written by the subject No user submitted, no editorial oversight No ✘ No
404, can't find an archived version either ? Unknown
No possibly written by the subject, author not identified No per the disclaimer at the bottom, it's a "blogger submitted" opinion ✘ No
No blog, no evidence that there is any editorial oversight or how their publication process works No ✘ No
not even a mention of the subject. No ✘ No
I have doubts about the reliability of this site as it appears to be a hobby blog. It is possible that it is independent and reliable but it doesn't help to establish notability. No doesn't mention the subject. ✘ No
same as above No ✘ No
No imdb listing equivalent No No ✘ No
No I'm going to go out on a limb and say that any source that publishes content in english so rife with grammatical and spelling errors probably doesn't have the type of editorial oversight we require of reliable sources. Also note that it's run by generic blogger.com bloggers. No ✘ No
No No No see source 19 ✘ No
No No see source #4, identical No ✘ No
No written by the subject No No ✘ No
No see source 14 No No ✘ No
No one sentence piece likely submitted as a pr by subject No No ✘ No
No Written by the subject. No No ✘ No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Quelle: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Kamal_Mustafa_(filmmaker)