The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 02:54, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kal & Ada volleycup (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No RS source. Greek Legend (talk) 05:27, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep for now - Needs sourcing rather than deletion. A quick search indicates that there is quite a bit of interest in this subject, although nearly all of it is in Swedish. perhaps it is suitable for Swedish wikipedia, but in light of the comments of others, I've decided to change my !vote to Delete.  InsertCleverPhraseHere  06:29, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think, Sports related articles are given leniency in Wikipedia. They will not pass general notability guidelines, still they will be kept. Even Swedish name search has no news --Greek Legend (talk) 06:38, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thats because niche sport articles are still useful for the people who are in that sport, even if that isn't that many people.  InsertCleverPhraseHere  06:44, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am not saying anything about this topic only, I have seen that few sports articles are unsourced and there is no Google news result. Even though wikipedians talks about WP:GNG, in case of sports related clubs, teams and tournaments this WP:GNG policy is not followed. Greek Legend (talk) 06:48, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Specific guidance on notability for sporting subjects is at Wikipedia:Notability (sports). --David Biddulph (talk) 07:51, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Those are the guidelines for sporting persons, sporting events are not really covered there.  InsertCleverPhraseHere  09:21, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Nordic Dragon 08:29, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. Nordic Dragon 08:29, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:51, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Userfy for now. If there are no references, it should be moved out of article space into user space to allow the user to add sources. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:30, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails WP:GNG, and it's claim to be "one of Sweden's biggest senior volleyball tournaments" is not enough. I guess userfy would be okay, but I'm not convinced it'll ever be notable. Joseph2302 (talk) 19:22, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete and Move to Draft instead as this is not yet acceptable with its current state and could be salvaged aside if needed for further work. SwisterTwister talk 03:46, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - searches did not turn up enough to pass WP:GNG. If someone wants to take over the article, wouldn't be against moving it to draft space.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:32, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.