The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 05:55, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

John Two-Hawks (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completely unsourced, flagged since 2010. Many complaints on talk page that this is an advert, and that attempts to include subjects real name and ethnicity have been deleted. There is a problem with non-Native musicians and writers trying to use Wikipedia to establish an Indigenous identity for themselves, and I think this is one of those cases. The article could stand on the basis of his music only, without the false claims on Native status, IF his musical contributions are judged notable. However, I am not sure they are. - Slàn, Kathryn NicDhàna ♫♦♫ 19:56, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - When searching for relevant sources, make sure they are about the same person as this BLP, as there are a number of people using this name. Also, many of the results that come up in a google test are concert listings or other ad copy that was submitted by the subject and never fact-checked. Diff where I removed some of the unsourced claims: [1]. Diff where a SPA removed non-advert info and added even more promotion: [2] - Slàn, Kathryn NicDhàna ♫♦♫ 20:14, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:08, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:08, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michaelzeng7 (talk) 20:31, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:51, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.