The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Dennis 2¢ 23:22, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jim Siegelman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced BLP. Search located a few minor citations and no reliable secondary sources sufficient to establish notability under either WP:AUTHOR or WP:ACADEMIC. Tgeairn (talk) 10:00, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Based on what's there, this does not meet the usual criteria. A re-direct to Snapping (book) would seem best. Bondegezou (talk) 12:44, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 13:41, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep It seems like he's notable outside of "Snapping", as he has also written "Dark Hero of the Information Age" which has been reviewed in the New York Times [1], New Scientist [2] and Publishers Weekly. [3] Meets WP:NAUTHOR criterion 3. Jinkinson talk to me 13:50, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:39, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete fails WP:AUTHOR and WP:ACADEMIC. - Cwobeel (talk) 14:51, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:21, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge with Flo Conway Thanks to User:Jinkinson for digging out those references to reviews of "Dark Hero...". I retract my earlier vote. I note that both "Snapping" and "Dark Hero..." were written with Flo Conway. Indeed, everything of any note that Siegelman or Conway have done appears to have been done with the other. The Flo Conway article is tagged but hasn't been AfD'd. Two almost identical articles for Siegelman and Conway seems silly, but there is perhaps just about enough for an article on the writing pair. I suggest trying that, and if feeling remains that there is not enough to establish notability, another AfD is always possible. Bondegezou (talk) 09:30, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 18:01, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• I just redirected Flo Conway to Snapping: America's Epidemic of Sudden Personality Change; that's a possibility for this one too. Drmies (talk) 00:13, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:43, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:05, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.