Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jada Fire
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can . Liz Read! Talk! 22:42, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Jada Fire (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unfortunately, she does not meet the notability requirements on Wikipedia for pornographic actors. Had the award-win aspect not been deprecated, maybe that wouldn't be the case. Trillfendi (talk) 20:16, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Women, and California. Shellwood (talk) 20:42, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Shellwood (talk) 20:44, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete does not meet our inclusion criteria for entertainers.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:11, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.