The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.--Kubigula (talk) 21:56, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Industrial Systems Research (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

This article about a company doesn't clearly indicate how the company is notable. I looked at the company's web page, but they didn't have a section for press on the company. I checked a few of their publications on amazon.co.uk, but couldn't see any mention of ways in which they were notable. I tried doing a google search, but the name of the company made it tough to google- I'm open to the possibility that there are sources that I missed. I searched for "Industrial Systems Research" using Google News and findarticles.com, and couldn't find any reliable sources. Prod removed by creator, who added information but no independent reliable sources. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 15:39, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. This is a consulting business that has collectively written a number of non-notable books. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 19:08, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Editor who started the article has also been spamming the series to other articles, strongly suggesting a COI in addition to notability problems. SFC9394 (talk) 19:30, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete No sources. Nothing that states why the company is notable. Reads like a publishers catalog. jonathon (talk) 02:08, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.