The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was draftify. ✗plicit 12:37, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'll Be Watching (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable future film, per WP:NFF, coverage is only about the announcement of the film, all articles are just reprintings of press releases, lacking significant independent coverage BOVINEBOY2008 08:26, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:29, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Draftify per WP:NFF, WP:NYF and WP:CRYSTAL. The Film Creator (talk) 09:08, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:15, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:16, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Draftify - Concur that the coverage does not constitute a "notable production" per WP:NFF, but the article can continue in draft space until more coverage comes out or the film is released. -2pou (talk) 18:56, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.