The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can . Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:50, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hunter Leppien (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems to be WP:TOOSOON for an article at the moment. I am unable to find sufficient coverage from independent sources to meet WP:GNG. JTtheOG (talk) 00:42, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Rugby union, and New Zealand. JTtheOG (talk) 00:42, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete in absence of suitable redirect Does look to be a case of WP:TOOSOON, not seeing enough currently for a WP:GNG pass here at the moment. Given there's no suitable redirect here, reluctant delete. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 08:44, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.