Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Homogeneity and heterogeneity
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. I see a consensus to Keep this article and no support for Deletion. Liz Read! Talk! 04:07, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Homogeneity and heterogeneity (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
nothing in common except the name; the main topic is already split: Homogeneous and heterogeneous mixtures. fgnievinski (talk) 04:32, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:19, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
- Keep and improve H&H as mixtures may indeed already be a section elsewhere; but that’s not the only interpretation. Budding mathematicians might be interested in the mathematical meanings of H&H, and for them I’d like to see the current short paragraph expanded rather than swept away altogether. Nick Levine (talk) 15:50, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
- If it's notable, it ought be split to H&H (mathematics). fgnievinski (talk) 08:21, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. An important distinction for binary relations. — Rgdboer (talk) 20:39, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
- Exactly, it's already well covered in Homogeneous relation. fgnievinski (talk) 08:23, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. This is a Wikipedia:Broad-concept article, the entire purpose of which is to explain how a concept may be applied in related ways across a number of different fields, as this coordinate pair of terms does. BD2412 T 01:47, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
- Keep - well sourced, and like many conceptual articles, although it’s borderline synthesis, it’s a good way to link concepts. Bearian (talk) 00:32, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.