The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:09, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Homai daughter of Bahman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The references don't say she's notable. Just that she exists. CynofGavuf 11:03, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep- seems to me that ruling a country is sufficiently notable. Reyk _YO! 11:52, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep(weak) if we have a whole series of Rulers of X, linked predecessor-successor, then the notability rises because they are part of that series. If nothing else, removing here will cause the links to go red, and people will keep trying to recreate the article 'for completeness'.David V Houston (talk) 12:20, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, assuming she's a real person - the sources seem to indicate she is, but the phrase 'a legendary queen' suggests otherwise and should probably be reworded. I think ruling a country is notable just by common sense, but it also satisfies Wikipedia:POLITICIAN. Olaf Davis (talk) 13:00, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Meets WP:POLITICIAN. Sources appear to verify the article's claims, in particular [1]. --Mkativerata (talk) 21:05, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:20, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:21, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per above: rulers of Iran are notable. However, consider a rename. I'm pretty sure the article title isn't in accord with our naming conventions. Ray^Talk 21:45, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.