The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was merge and redirect with either bisexual or bicurious · Katefan0^(scribble) 19:28, 14 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It was suggested on this article's discussion page that the entry be either deleted or merged with bisexual. I've therefore brought this here - if kept, I'll make the POV changes I previously proposed on the article's discussion page. CLW 11:42, 20 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to bisexual - --Outlander 17:06, 20 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Relisting for more involvement. -Splash^talk 00:52, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment, no vote yet. Well, I have never heard the term before, but I got 9,730 Google hits for it, so it’s likely a legitimate term in the GLBT world. ♠DanMS 00:59, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge to bisexual - pretty sure I heard this on Sex and the City once. -- BD2412 ^talk 01:34, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
  • Per comments below, merge to bi-curious would be fine. -- BD2412 ^talk 14:39, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
• Merge to bisexual. Rob Church ^Talk 01:46, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge and redirect --best, kevin ···Kzollman | Talk··· 01:49, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to bisexual. -- Kjkolb 01:57, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge and Redirect to bisexual. Cnwb 03:12, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• M&R to bi-curious. ♥purplefeltangel ^(talk) ♥ ^(contribs) 03:24, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to bisexual — seems to be common enough slang on Google. Andrew pmk | Talk 03:26, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge and redirect to bi-curious, as per ♥purplefeltangel. Do not merge with bisexuality. — FJG 09:43, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge and redirect to bi-curious; a merge to bisexual would be both incorrect and a POV attack on bisexual people. --Jacquelyn Marie 14:48, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge and redirect to bisexual. >: Roby Wayne ^{Talk • Hist} 05:00, 2 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - a euphemism for bisexual. --MacRusgail 13:00, 2 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge to bi-curious per Purplefeltangel. Ilmari Karonen 23:37, 2 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge → bi-curious. I also suggest the same treatment to homoflexible. ~⌈Markaci⌋ 2005-10-5 T 01:31:43 Z
• Redirect to Bisexuality -- BBlackmoor ^(talk) 04:59, 12 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment As of 10/14, there is a short mention at bi-curious and none at bisexuality. More could possibly be merged to bi-curious, but I see no need and think the current reference is fine. --Jacquelyn Marie 04:50, 14 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.