Henry Herbert Armstrong (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of meeting WP:NACADEMIC. — Moriwen (talk) 19:07, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. — Moriwen (talk) 19:07, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Delete, doesn't seem to meet wp:n Qrstw (talk) 19:18, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Indiana, Michigan, Missouri, New Jersey, Ohio, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, Washington, and Wisconsin. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:34, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. I found 1 1/3 reviews of one book "Autobiographic elements in Latin inscriptions" (a published version of his PhD thesis) [1] [2] but I don't think it's enough for WP:AUTHOR or WP:PROF. —David Eppstein (talk) 21:19, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. The article on Henry Herbert Armstrong has been expanded since the intial nomination. Armstrong meets WP:NACADEMIC #3 with his fellowship of the American Academy in Rome that he received in 1903 for his work in classical studies and archaeology. He is also known for his work on the Volscian and Roman settlement of Privernum, with some of his texts still being republished by an academic press nearly a century later. GeorgiaHuman (talk) 22:52, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as per GeorgiaHuman and WP:HEY. Bearian (talk) 05:10, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep after the great improvements -- republication of text is pretty important -- and as he's been dead for 90 years, it's very unlikely to be or become a vanity article. -- Michael Scott Asato Cuthbert (talk) 19:40, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]