The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:27, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hayden B. Siegel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet criteria of WP:GNG or WP:NMUSIC. ... discospinster _talk 21:06, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. ... discospinster _talk 21:06, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. ... discospinster _talk 21:06, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. ... discospinster _talk 21:06, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete not yet notable musician, one published paper isn't notable for an academic, not generally notable. I don't find any reliable independent sources covering this individual. Schazjmd (talk) 22:20, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment That paper's publisher, IJSRP, appears on a list of open-access predatory journals. See WP article on Predatory publishing. Just plain Bill (talk) 22:52, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Presumably an autobiography, with no sign of notability – doesn't meet any of the applicable criteria. I am unable to find any secondary sources talking about him. May become notable in the future, but not just yet. --bonadea contributions talk 10:07, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - lack of significant coverage about the subject himself. The references are two Imgur social media cites, a Texas law that allegedly violated his rights, a local paper, and a paper he wrote. There's so much personal information in it as to make me wonder that the subject or someone connected to him wrote this page. Bearian (talk) 16:28, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.