The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. None of the "keep" !votes manages to convince. Randykitty (talk) 12:49, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hattori Sushi Devil (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article doesnt appear to meet WP:NOTE Amortias (T)(C) 20:11, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep The restaurant serves over 20 varieties of fish, which doesn't seem too common in Sweden. It's a luxurious Japanese restaurant and there are references that discuss the notability of it. Its speedy deletion was also declined due to 'enough implied importance in the given sources'.--Sushi8Eater (talk) 23:20, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:38, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:38, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:38, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - upscale local restaurant with local reviews. There's no place for this on a global project. --Orange Mike | Talk 02:54, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Serving 20 types of fish does not make a restaurant notable. Subject is not getting non-local reviews. Wikipedia is global. Fails WP:GNG --Jersey92 (talk) 13:23, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti^{*Let's talk!*} 00:47, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Sounds tasty, but no, as per Jersey above. Nwlaw63 (talk) 00:49, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete While this restaurant sounds great, it does not satisfy WP:CORP. It lacks significant, independent coverage in reliable sources. This is especially important for a local business, which tend not to be notable.
• Keep May as well delete other articles in Category:Restaurants in Stockholm. In comparison, this one's better referenced & seems more notable than the others.--Futeb00l (talk) 22:29, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Passes WP:NOTE and WP:CS.--Deletapedia (talk) 18:32, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.