The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 11:48, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Haroon Kadwani (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Haroon Kadwani

The article on this actor does not establish general notability, and is also the work of blocked sockpuppets. There is also a draft, so that the article can be deleted rather than draftified. Since the acting notability guideline states that persons meeting the guideline are likely to be notable, a biography that both fails to meet general notability and was the work of sockpuppets should not be kept in article space, but should be in draft space for improvement by neutral editors. A review of the references shows that none of them can be considered secondary coverage:

Also, the subject only marginally satisfies acting notability, with two leading television film roles, and two previous secondary television roles that are not major. Both of the articles on leading television film roles were also written by now-blocked sockpuppets. (I have tagged them as needing review for COI.) The puppeteers may be trying to create a walled garden, but that is a concern beyond the scope of this AFD. This article does not establish general notability. This article and the film articles are tainted by sockpuppetry. This article should be deleted. In view of the history of prior creation and deletion of articles on the subject, the title should be given Extended-Confirmed Create protection. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:51, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:51, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:51, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:51, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - while NACTOR is an SNG, it does not trump WP:GNG, which this does not satisfy. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:00, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.