Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hans Latscha
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Rugby union at the 1900 Summer Olympics#Germany. Sandstein 11:13, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Hans Latscha (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Prod removed without explanation or addition of sources. Prod justification was Fails WP:GNG, WP:SPORTCRIT #5, WP:NOLYMPICS, and violates the general criteria of WP:NOTDATABASE. No significant coverage in our article or the German article, and no coverage identifiable in a search.
BilledMammal (talk) 11:55, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Rugby union, and Germany. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:02, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete there is nothing known about this individual other than he was on the Rugby team when it went to the Olympics, and was in a competition where everyone came in in the top 3. Beyond that, medals were not given out in the 1900 Olympics. There were no national teams until the 1908 Olympics. This article just reeks of presentism and trying to anachronistically apply the current Olympic framework to our understanding of a game that pre-dates the current framework.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:23, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
- If nothing can be found on this guy, then redirect to Rugby union at the 1900 Summer Olympics per WP:ATD, WP:PRESERVE, WP:R#KEEP and WP:CHEAP. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 15:09, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
- Redirect to Rugby union at the 1900 Summer Olympics#Rosters Doesn't appear to be enough for a GNG pass, although there might be some offline sourcing in books for example. Without this though, redirect is a suitable WP:ATD and there doesn't look to be any confusion with the name to stop a redirect here. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 17:48, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Olympics-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 11:08, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.