The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 17:12, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Gujranwala Times (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sorry to say but this is one of many dummy publications in Pakistan. Fails WP:GNG. @Saqib: If he knows anything about this newspaper? Störm (talk) 10:11, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete clearly fails WP:GNG as well Audience criteria. --Saqib (talk) 11:05, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Saqib Thanks for your cooperation. Störm (talk) 13:09, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Excellent detective work; this is a borderline hoax and has no claims to notability even as a dummy publication.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 16:02, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. – Uanfala 11:17, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. – Uanfala 11:17, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.