The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 21:22, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Glooby (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

New e-commerce site, in an article supported by 3 passing mentions and a short article in a small Swedish local newspaper. So no, not notable. Calton | Talk 15:31, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Draftify The cited sources show bare minimum WP:GNG notability, but there is a significance issue. Draftify to allow article creator opportunity to find better sources. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 20:20, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as simple advertising complete with the announcement-esque sources. SwisterTwister talk 02:17, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S  11:21, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions.  ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S  11:22, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep reliable sources available about the subject. Bessloop (talk) 10:05, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete  The news bubble present for the startup of a company is a WP:NOTNEWS problem, and the article does not make for a good encyclopedic topic.  Fails WP:SUSTAINED.  Unscintillating (talk) 21:35, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.