The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:13, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GEO-LEO (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No references or clear claim of significance. Reads like an advertisement and was created by a user with no other edits and "Geo" in their name. Used to be much more promotional, but appears to have since been whittled down to a stub. Bsoyka (talk) 05:39, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions. Bsoyka (talk) 05:39, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Bsoyka (talk) 05:39, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Astronomy, Geography, and Germany. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:00, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. It seems to be just an online repository. It could be included in a list of online libraries, but there doesn't seem to be anything distinctive about this one. Sean Brunnock (talk) 11:04, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, it's just another online repository, agree with Sean on it. Artem.G (talk) 09:50, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. No significance. No Great Shaker (talk) 21:43, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.