The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 12:27, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fugug (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete as unverifiable, appears to be at best an alias for something for which an article already exists. Searching for sources online merely finds apparent citogenesis from this Wikipedia article. — The Anome (talk) 11:07, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Ethiopia. Shellwood (talk) 11:26, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment I found at least 3 academic sources mentioning "Fugug" in relation to Oromo creation narratives: [1] (p. 9), [2], and [3]. Only the third source gives an indication of it being an identifiable geographic place, so it may not meet GEOLAND. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 23:04, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. The original source is dead and the archive copies failed to capture it before it went down. The sources on the Oromo mythology found by Presidentman do not seem to consistently identify the same definite place. An article on the mythology would be fine, welcome even, but this isn't it. We can't have an article claiming to be a geographic feature based on a bunch of mythology. SpinningSpark 12:45, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.