Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fritz Müller (rugby union)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Rugby union at the 1900 Summer Olympics#Rosters per WP:ATD. – Joe (talk) 13:02, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Fritz Müller (rugby union) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Prod and notability tag removed without explanation or addition of sources. Prod justification was Fails WP:GNG, WP:SPORTCRIT #5, WP:NOLYMPICS, and violates the general criteria of WP:NOTDATABASE - all we know about him is his name, his nationality, and that he played for FC 1880 Frankfurt. No significant coverage in our article or the German article, and no coverage identifiable in a search.
BilledMammal (talk) 11:37, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Rugby union, and Germany. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:04, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete another misleading article. There were no official teams from any country at the Olympics before 1908 period, so the wording of this article is very misleading. We also lack any significant sources on this individual.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:19, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
- If nothing can be found on this guy, then redirect to Rugby union at the 1900 Summer Olympics per WP:ATD, WP:PRESERVE, WP:R#KEEP and WP:CHEAP. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 15:09, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
- Redirect to Rugby union at the 1900 Summer Olympics#Rosters Doesn't appear to be enough for a GNG pass, although there might be some offline sourcing in books for example. Without this though, redirect is a suitable WP:ATD and there doesn't look to be any confusion with the name to stop a redirect here.
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Olympics-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 11:08, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: per JPL. Not opposed to "Redirect" as ATD per Spiderone. -- Otr500 (talk) 04:18, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.