Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Firecons
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. There was no appetite for redirecting in the final week of the debate. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 18:39, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
- Firecons (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article fails to establish notability. TTN (talk) 01:23, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 01:23, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
- Merge to List of Decepticons, which does not currently mention them. Argento Surfer (talk) 12:27, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Onel5969 TT me 01:35, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Onel5969 TT me 01:35, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
- Redirect to List of Decepticons. Non-notable minor characters in the toy line. There's nothing to merge as the content is largely uncited original research. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:01, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
- Comment List of Decepticons was merged into Lists of Transformers characters on July 1. Argento Surfer (talk) 12:28, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Since the preferred merge/redirect target no longer exists, where to now?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SoWhy 07:36, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
Relisting comment: Since the preferred merge/redirect target no longer exists, where to now?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SoWhy 07:36, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
- Perhaps we could just delete it. Josh Milburn (talk) 22:33, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
- I echo J Milburn's above comment, and think a delete may be the best option for this. Aoba47 (talk) 14:24, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.