The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 01:52, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Filip Misolic (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non-notable tennis player who fails to meet WP:NTENNIS and WP:GNG Adamtt9 (talk) 01:34, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 01:42, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Tennis-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 01:42, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Austria-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 01:42, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - nothing of note found in an Austrian search Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:52, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previously nominated via WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:15, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom, there's loads of tennis players at his ranking level and age, and most of them never end up becoming notable. Iffy★Chat -- 09:42, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.