The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:24, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fatai Vailala (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not close to meeting WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG, playing in a weak American rugby league. JTtheOG (talk) 03:53, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S  05:39, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S  05:39, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I agree that he fails to meet the requirements for rugby union biographies since we don't consider PRO Rugby as a fully professional league. I'm also unable to find the kind of significant coverage in third-party sources that would be needed to meet the general notability criterion. Pichpich (talk) 15:07, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Rugby union-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:37, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - neither WP:ATHLETE nor WP:GNG has been met. Kansiime (talk) 00:33, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as not yet suggesting the applicable notability. SwisterTwister talk 04:19, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.