The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Stifle (talk) 00:39, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Everest Peace Project (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

The organization appears to be a well-marketed climbing club with very little notability. It has been heavily edited by Lancetrumbull (talk · contribs) the founder and executive director of The Everest Peace Project. Despite what the article says, the organization seems to be dedicated to selling DVDs. Toddst1 (talk) 01:52, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Toddst1, you're alway submit this article for deletetion, again and again. I don't understand why you keep doing this... do you have anythig agains't this movie? From my point of view, it's out of criterias. A small clean up in the article, it makes sense ... but to fight for several months, it becomes an obsession! Thak you. Antaya (talk) 04:37, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: According to the edit history, there was a merge proposal but this is the first proposal or nomination to delete. This article has issues and ad hominems are not helpful here. • Gene93k (talk) 14:18, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment If you think the article is notable, I suggest fixing up the references so we can see what the sources of the article are. Where are these links from? It looks like a couple might be legitimate, but it would be nice to give dates and to identify the sources.ChildofMidnight (talk) 03:37, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:12, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:19, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete--since a good look at these references (and some of them were bogus--one was mentioned twice, another was hardly independent) proves there's little here. Really, you got two articles from entirely local papers/websites (coverage probably only because some of the group members got the interview from their local reporter), there's one from a sort of bloggiething, and the most notable thing was the Dalai Lama's endorsement (which can be found in somewhat dependable-looking publications). So I'm really not convinced of notability here--this one thing, then, this endorsement, strikes me as a single news event. Drmies (talk) 05:21, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton ^{Happy Holidays} 00:52, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The external link to the "official website" is about a movie. The article is about an organization. What is the relation? What is the story? I'm confused. ChildofMidnight (talk) 01:18, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. News search shows significant mention of the project that is covered by myriad of sites in various countries. Albeit some of these news items detail a person who joined the group in the expedition (e.g. 1, 2, 3) there are others who specifically describe the group (4, 5). I feel this amount of coverage is significant to cover WP:GNG. ^LeaveSleaves _talk 15:05, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.