The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Very little participation, but the one "keep" opinion is so weak I can't give it much weight. It asserts that GNG is met, but does not explain on the basis of which sources, and its assertion that "being a television presenter is notable" is not based on any guideline or practice.  Sandstein  18:59, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Eva Nazemson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

She hardly seems notable especially for simply being best known for the on-air event gaining attention from YouTube and my best search results this, this, this and a few results with browser. SwisterTwister talk 17:16, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 17:19, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 17:19, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 17:19, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 17:19, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - clearly meets WP:GNG. For her television work, and other events. --BabbaQ (talk) 18:03, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - no indication of notability in the article and I fail to find any realiable sources that indicate that she is more than yet another TV host. (The claim made in the article that she "became world news" for vomiting is clearly preposterous and not basis for any serious notability claim.) It doesn't seem as if the game show she is the host of is notable - not that notability is inherited, it isn't, but if a programme is a minor show without notability it clearly indicates that the host also fails notability criteria. --bonadea contributions talk 14:17, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Being a television presenter is notable. (if being just a television presenter was reason for deletion then we would have to delete several other articles with less notability than this one). Bonadea seems to throw random opinions around without the knowledge about the shows nor the person.. We dont delete articles based on an opinion be delete it per Wikipedia guidelines and this one is passing WP:GNG. Simply because a person is perhaps most famous for a worldwide reporting disgusting incident is not a reason for deletion either, if doing something disgusting would be reason for deletion then we would have to reevaluate the substance of several hundred of crime bios etc etc. Eva Nazemson has made herself a name in Sweden for hosting game shows. that is notable. --BabbaQ (talk) 22:55, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.