The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can . ✗plicit 11:35, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

EquityBee (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article lacks reliable sources beyond trade press, with much of the coverage focusing primarily on fundraising events. I read them all - only minor mentions, commets, press-release like coverage. no sigcov Linkusyr (talk) 08:42, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

delete - does not really pass WP:NCORP, mostly routine tech business coverage Bluethricecreamman (talk) 17:06, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance, Companies, Software, and California. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:49, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

*Delete: The article does not meet the criteria outlined in WP:NCORP as it lacks significant, independent, and reliable coverage. Most of the references are limited to trade press, routine fundraising announcements, or press-release-style content, which fail to demonstrate notability or provide in-depth coverage of the company. Without substantial evidence of the company's broader impact or sustained coverage in reputable, independent sources, the article does not satisfy Wikipedia's notability guidelines for organizations.--जय बाबा की^Talk 16:56, 25 January 2025 (UTC) Blocked sock. Jfire (talk) 02:32, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.