The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 02:03, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ends of the Earth (figurative) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article only has one news link as a source which doesn't correlate with the content of the article. The other sources are religious text and a Youtube video. Overall, this article was created on personal research per WP:OR. JudeccaXIII (talk) 02:56, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retain: sources amended - BobKilcoyne (talk) 04:46, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete by WP:Not a dictionary. Kitfoxxe (talk) 08:24, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:15, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:15, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, the examples have little in common with each other, to the point of not even exactly matching this phrase - the related dab page does a better job illustrating the use of the phrase, and that's enough for this topic. A notable figurative term should have some strong etymology sources easily available, but the best source I can come up with is this - which doesn't clear WP:NOTDICT as mentioned above. Antepenultimate (talk) 03:20, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Its just a random collection of times that a particular phrase has been used, mashed together to make an article. As mentioned, it should be deleted per both WP:NOTDICT and WP:SYNTH. 64.183.45.226 (talk) 17:33, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OK, delete - BobKilcoyne (talk) 06:11, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.