The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I'd like to also note that this was also deleted off of wiktionary as well. ---J.S ^(T/C) 03:49, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Emephilia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Likely hoax. Term gets no Ghits. Robotman1974 19:42, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - completely non-notable and probably made up, as there are no google hits and urbandictionary doesn't even have a definition. Jayden54 20:48, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete No sources or hits and sounds like a hoax. TSO1D 21:08, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above; also, creator's first (and only) edit, never a good sign. Newyorkbrad 22:46, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete hoaxalicious. Danny Lilithborne 23:21, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per all FirefoxMan 00:33, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Four Sources on deviantart ALONE:

http://the-life-in-me.deviantart.com/ http://xshedevilx.deviantart.com/ http://Emevas.deviantart.com/ http://saccharin.deviantart.com How is a fettish, no matter how obscure a hoax? Like a phobia, it can be just about anything. If you so desire me to, I'll make more edits, assuming that makes me a "Credible" wikipedia user. Look at the above reasons for deletion: "Per above"?, "Hoaxallicous"? How is that a valid arguement? Let's be open minded people. -XKrozz 09:36, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Rectifying My Arguement: Why would someone create four separate profiles located at different parts of the world, with completely different personalities, styles, AND Mediums? View my above sources and examine their vast differeces. People just don't spend 2+ years on the largest online art community to conjure a hoax, that's just absurd. And if "Urban dictionary" is your #1 resource, then so be it, I'll create an entry. -XKrozz 21:09, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.