The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can . ✗plicit 23:57, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edoardo Stella (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:GNG. As written the article cites some significant coverage in Rugbymeet ([1], [2]), a publication that does not list any editorial policies and whose reliability is unclear. Outside that publication, I'm unable to find any independent coverage of the subject. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:12, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Rugby union, Germany, and Italy. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:12, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Looks to fail WP:GNG. There is some coverage in a routine search, but I don't think it reaches WP:GNG coverage. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 20:38, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.