Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eaton Green
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep. Fram (talk) 10:56, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Eaton Green (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Without references, this is about as blatant a WP:BLP violation as it's possible to get (the sole reference is to Black Flag, which I'd venture isn't a reliable source). Even if it is referenced, I'd question whether there is anything notable about this particular case. – iridescent 22:55, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I added a reference to the Guardian, that took me all of 30 seconds to find in Google News Archive. from it's nature, there are clearly more. Probably will pass BLP as a major national story in the UK. DGG (talk) 23:30, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Doesn't meet wp:n Staffwaterboy Critique Me Guestbook Hate Comments 06:10, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | Talk 00:17, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, a friendly IP address now seems to have quietly added masses of reliable-source references to the article. Notability and verifiability no longer appear to be in question; the article is now quite well sourced. ~ mazca t|c 11:03, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Change to Keep per Mazca. The source added by DGG wasn't enough to convince me (proof that something happened isn't necessarily proof that it warrants coverage) but the sources just added persuade me that this was a significant case. I still think the negative BLP statements sourced solely to Black Flag need to go, though. – iridescent 12:17, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.