The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to East Bergholt. Among the various suggestions, redirect gets votes and is provided with an argument. That NGEO makes anything notable is questionable, and not every human habitation is notable. Drmies (talk) 03:25, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

East End, Suffolk (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

totally unsourced. there seems to be nothing that suggests this actually exists over and above google maps. the grange country and caravan park gives its address as Colchester and i could find nothing about the butcher's. the pub used as an illustration is in East Bergholt according to their website. here Fails WP:GEOLAND Domdeparis (talk) 09:45, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to East Bergholt, as it falls within that civil parish so can be mentioned there. It appears on Ordnance Survey maps, so I think it does exist as a (very small) settlement, but it clearly isn't significant enough to warrant a separate article. Jellyman (talk) 11:21, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• I agree with the redirect suggestion. Domdeparis (talk) 11:50, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Regardless of outcome, a hatnote is needed to East End (Long Island). – Train2104 (t • c) 01:25, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Both articles are sufficiently disambiguated. No-one's going to end up in Suffolk looking for Long Island! (Whoops, should have read "East End of Long Island ... New York's Suffolk County" first). It does need adding to East End (disambiguation) though - I'll do that. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:45, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Antepenultimate (talk) 14:31, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Antepenultimate (talk) 14:31, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep If it appears on Ordnance Survey maps it is a legally recognised place and hence meets WP:NGEO. AusLondonder (talk) 23:07, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment do you have the proof that it appears on the OS maps? Domdeparis (talk) 12:11, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Domdeparis: - it's there, just east of East Bergholt. Mjroots (talk) 18:52, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment your reply gave me an idea so I checked the OS website and I managed to find it but only with the name East End Lane Colchester and not East End, Suffolk itself. I am not sure what legally recognised means does the fact that it exists on the OS map mean it is legally recognised? On the OS maps even individual farm-houses are noted does that make them legally recognised and thus notable enough for a page with no other coverage? Domdeparis (talk) 13:31, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep It's a human habitation and we keep all such. Andrew D. (talk) 18:22, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.