EV Group (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company; fails WP:NCORP. All sourcing is WP:ORGTRIV coverage of new facility openings, etc. ([1]); WP:USERGENERATED content ([2]); WP:TRIVIALMENTIONS ([3], [4], [5], [6]); the company's own website and/or press releases, and other non-independent sources ([7], [8], [9]); WP:PRSOURCE-driven coverage in WP:TRADES publications ([10], [11], [12]); and a WP:PRIMARYSOURCE document ([13]). One source does not mention the company at all ([14]). Nothing else qualifying came up in a WP:BEFORE search. Dclemens1971 (talk) 14:10, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business and Austria. Dclemens1971 (talk) 14:10, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:57, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: To the closing admin, I have restructured the article entirely; check it before you go ahead and keep or delete it. Given the current structure, I believe the subjects meet the notability guidelines. Note: I'm no the initial editor, I just volunteered to improve it. If the resolution was to keep, kindly place an 'Improvement' tag on the article; otherwise, delete it. Cameremote (talk) I came from a remote place 17:07, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment from nominator offering a brief analysis of the newly added sources: more WP:TRADES coverage based on press releases ([15], [16], [17], [18], [19]) and one actual press release ([20]). Still no WP:SIGCOV in WP:SIRS and thus no NCORP pass. Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:13, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete While I appreciate the above editor's efforts to improve the article, I think notability is still missing here. Warrenᚋᚐᚊᚔ 09:24, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Per nom. Though there has been some effort to improve it, this still doesn't appear notable. TheBritinator (talk) 20:14, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]