Langbahn Team – Weltmeisterschaft

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Drevviken Party

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 15:31, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Drevviken Party (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tiny political party without significant coverage other than local newspapers. Geschichte (talk) 07:48, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • I think you might not understand what constitutes an acceptable source. "Primary source" means written by the subject itself. Here, the Drevviken Party was asked to send a piece about themselves to SVT. Can you not see that, among others from the use of "we"? "Vi har två mandat..." Regional, local - it makes little difference, it's still too small. Geschichte (talk) 15:38, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • I am talking about the Sveriges Radio source here written by Baris Kayhan from SR. SR states in the article that it is "oberoende i förhållande till politiska, religiösa, ekonomiska, offentliga och privata särintressen." Please demonstrate how in your opinion this is a primary source. Also, please provide a link to the relevant Wikipedia policy requiring national-level sources to establish notability. Tammbecktalk 16:41, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 09:38, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 09:38, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 22:08, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 18:53, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 12:10, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz Humbug! 22:51, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.