The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. What the... Can't sleep, clown will eat me 08:25, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dog Fart Neutralizing Thong (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

I nominate this article for deletion per WP:SPAM. This appears to be an ad rather than anything relevant to an encylopedia. And the whole idea of a "fart neutralizing thong" just doesn't pass the smell test for me, or maybe I can just blame it on the dog. :) Akira 03:44, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete unfortunately this doesn't appear a hoax. It's still WP:SPAM and unencyclopedic. Good for a laugh though :) Dragomiloff 04:01, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete. per spam, spam, spam; and if that isn't good enough, then Wikipedia is not a dictionary. But also good for a laugh per Dragomiloff. I can't believe we're giving this the benefit of the doubt. -- Antepenultimate 04:14, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• BJAODN then delete per above. MER-C 04:15, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as patent nonsense. Everyone knows that thongs make farts whistle - I'd rather smell the darned things than be whistled at by dogs' hindquarters whilst going to buy tabs. QuagmireDog 05:14, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• BJAODN deserves this one then dump it like a bad odor (or should that be odour? :P)) Wintermut3 06:18, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - even though it did give me a great idea for a "friend's" Kwanza gift. SkierRMH,08:15, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as patent nonsense and/or spam. -Switch ^t 09:14, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• speedy per spam --Peregrine_^AY 11:18, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete non-sense. TSO1D 14:36, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete but I'll endorse the BJAODN. As an owner of two boxers who have the ability to clear a room quickly, I only wish.... Fan-1967 14:50, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, although my Christmas shopping problem is now over. - Smerdis of Tlön 15:38, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete inadequately source and likely nonsense.-- danntm ^T _C 18:38, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom Baristarim 19:59, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Fumigate and BJAODN - This article smells like BJAODN fodder... of course, it could be the beans too. :-p Torinir _{( Ding my phone My support calls E-Support Options )} 20:53, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Patent nonsense, should be in Bad Jokes and Other Deleted Nonsense, or Uncyclopedia. --SunStar Net^talk 20:54, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as spam. After looking at their website and googling for Flat-D I am completely undecided as to whether or not the product line is for real or whether it's just a joke. Apparently products of this kind are bought by or for dog owners as joke gifts... see example, right. Dpbsmith (talk) 23:16, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment The company's website has links to what seems to be an authentic CBS News story[1] I guess the company and product line (Flat-D) are legit and just might be worth an article. There's no indication that this particular product is of any importance, however, so my delete vote stands. Dpbsmith (talk) 23:22, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete patent nonsense substub. - ∅ (∅), 02:51, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete, unencyclopedic, substub. WP:NOT a directory of every novelty product in the world. -- The Anome 15:59, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete what the hell? Definitely spam. Hut 8.5 19:06, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.